Test

Zoo; a “Neutral” Documentary on Bestiality Premieres at Sundance Film Festival

“Zoo” Director, Robinson Devor - surprisingly not ashamed to show his face, relaxes in his cage.

Highlights:

“.. an elegant, eerily lyrical film..”

“.. this strange and strangely beautiful film combines audio interviews with elegiac [nostalgic.. CN] visual re-creations intended to conjure up the mood and spirit of situations.”

“Though "Zoo" is intent on allowing these men [assorted pig & duck fuckers .. CN] to be heard, Devor's intention is not polemical [a passionate, strongly worded, and often controversial argument for or against something..CN]

- Kenneth Turan
Film critic, LA Times

Amazing.

Read and weep here.

.

Brigitte Gabriel

Survivor of Islamic Terror Warns America.

Watch at least first 4 parts.

.

The "Progressive" Approach

Rehab:

Patrick Kennedy, Mel Gibson, Mark Foley; who’s next?

Demos: Not Your Parent’s Democrat Party

Foley Shmoley

AP Exclusive: Reid Got $1M in Land Sale

Story here

.

Child Pornography

From Saudi Arabia:

Vote Democrat in ‘06!

All America-Haters Will Thank You

Dems Fairy Tales

Who’s Cherry-Picking Now?

Raed Tihs

Olny 55% of plepoe can raed and userdtnand tihs:

I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid! Aoccdrnig to rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it dseno't mtaetr in waht oerdr the ltteres in a wrod are, the olny iproamtnt tihng is taht the frsit and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it whotuit a pboerlm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Azanmig huh? Yaeh, and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt!

Hat tip: Amira

Osama bin Laden Dead?

23 September 2006

PARIS - Saudi intelligence services have determined that terrorist mastermind Osama bin Laden died of typhoid in August, the French regional daily L’Est Republicain reported on its website on Saturday.

The newspaper said it based its information on a document classified ‘defence secret’ originating in the French DGSE intelligence services. According to the story, the DGSE informed President Jacques Chirac of the Saudi report on Thursday.

The DGSE document, printed with the report, reads in part, ‘According to a usually reliable source, the Saudi intelligence services are said to have acquired the information that Osama bin Laden is dead. The information gleaned by the Saudis indicates that the head of Al Qaeda was a victim of a very strong attack of thyphoid... in Pakistan on August 23, 2006.’

The document goes on to say that bin Laden’s geographical isolation rendered all medical assistance impossible.

Story here

More here

Original French story here

Will Jews Ever Get Hip to the Dems?

Read this: The Democratic Party and Jews.

Also this: on criticizing Islam from James Lileks
.

Oh-oh!

Are Videotaped Beheadings Covered by Geneva?

by Ann Coulter

Sen. John McCain has been carrying so much water for his friends in the mainstream media that he now has to state for the record to Republican audiences: "I hold no brief for al Qaeda."

Well, that's a relief.

It turns out, the only reason McCain is demanding that prisoners like Khalid Sheikh Mohammed -- mastermind of the 9/11 attacks, the beheading of journalist Daniel Pearl and other atrocities -- be treated like Martha Stewart facing an insider trading charge is this: "It's all about the United States of America and what is going to happen to Americans who are taken prisoner in future wars."

McCain, along with Sen. Lindsey Graham and Sen. John Warner -- or, as the Times now calls him, the "courtly Virginian" -- want terrorists treated like Americans accused of crimes, with full access to classified information against them and a list of the undercover agents involved in their capture. Liberals' interest in protecting classified information started and ended with Valerie Plame.

As Graham explained, he doesn't want procedures used against terrorists at Guantanamo "to become clubs to be used against our people." Actually, clubs would be a step up from videotaped beheadings.

Or as the New York Times wrote in the original weasel talking points earlier this summer: "The Geneva Conventions protect Americans. If this country changes the rules, it's changing the rules for Americans taken prisoner abroad. That is far too high a price to pay so this administration can hang on to its misbegotten policies."

There hasn't been this much railing about the mistreatment of a hostage since Monica Lewinsky was served canapes at the Pentagon City Ritz-Carlton Hotel while being detained by the FBI.

The belief that we can impress the enemy with our magnanimity is an idea that just won't die. It's worse than the idea that paying welfare recipients benefits won't discourage them from working. (Some tiny minority might still seek work.) It's worse than the idea that taxes can be raised endlessly without reducing tax receipts. (As the Laffer Curve illustrates, at some point -- a point this country will never reach -- taxes could theoretically be cut so much that tax revenues would decline.)

But being nice to enemies is an idea that has never worked, no matter how many times liberals make us do it. It didn't work with the Soviet Union, Imperial Japan, Hitler or the North Vietnamese -- enemies notable for being more civilized than the Islamic savages we are at war with today.

By the way, how did the Geneva Conventions work out for McCain at the Hanoi Hilton?

It doesn't even work with the Democrats, whom Bush kept sucking up to his first year in office. No more movie nights at the White House with Teddy Kennedy these days, I'm guessing.

It was this idea (Be nice!) that fueled liberals' rage at Reagan when he vanquished the Soviet Union with his macho "cowboy diplomacy" that was going to get us all blown up. As the Times editorial page hysterically described Reagan's first year in office: "Mr. Reagan looked at the world through gun sights." Yes, he did! And now the Evil Empire is no more.

It was this idiotic idea of being nice to predators that drove liberal crime policies in the '60s and '70s -- leading like night into day to unprecedented crime rates. Now these same liberal ninnies want to extend their tender mercies not just to rapists and murderers, but to Islamic terrorists.

Mayor Rudy Giuliani, Ronald Reagan and Winston Churchill had a differentidea: Instead of rewarding bad behavior, punish bad behavior. How many times does punishment have to work and coddling have to fail before we never have to hear again that if we treat terrorists well, the terrorists will treat our prisoners well?

Fortunately, history always begins this morning for liberals, so they can keep flogging the same idiotic idea that has never, ever worked: Be nice to our enemies and they will reward us with good behavior.

Never mind trusting liberals with national security. Never mind trusting them with raising kids. These people shouldn't even be allowed to own pets.

If the Democrats and the four pathetic Republicans angling to be called "mavericks" by the New York Times really believe we need to treat captured terrorists nicely in order to ensure that the next American they capture will be well-treated, then why stop at 600-thread-count sheets for the Guantanamo detainees? We must adopt Sharia law.

As McCain might put it, I hold no brief for al Qaeda, but what would better protect Americans they take prisoner than if America went whole hog and became an Islamic republic? On the plus side, we can finally put Rosie O'Donnell in a burka.
.

20 Reasons We May Lose The War on Terror

We are criticized for trying to take over the world and yet we are seen by the enemy as too weak to invoke fear/respect.

We are female dominated society, they are a male dominated one.

We have too much to lose, they have nothing to lose.

We teach our kids that hatred is wrong and that all people, especially those with color in their skin, are good, they teach their children that we are evil and should be destroyed.

We want to live and are willing to give up freedoms to do so, they have no qualms killing us and actually want to die.

We feel guilty about what we have, they hate us for what we have and feel no guilt in killing us.

We are called immoral when we accidentally kill civilians who should know better than to be where they are, they get called insurgents when they purposely kill/behead innocent civilians.

We get criticized constantly by our own media and our leaders are brutally ridiculed, while their leaders get glorified by the same organizations.

Our media loves nothing more than to make us look bad and provide intelligence to the enemy, their media is a propaganda tool.

We largely follow religions that say we shalt not kill, they use their religion to pretend they have no choice but to kill.

When we accidentally blow up a mosque where the enemy is hiding we have committed a crime, when they blow up a mosque to create chaos it is our fault for having angered them.

When we tell the truth about them being prone to violence, when they then get violent in reaction, even when we apologize, it is portrayed as our fault.

Our leaders are gutless cowards who have to pander to a stupid electorate to keep their precious jobs, their leaders are chosen by who is best at coming up with ways to kill us.

We fight too fair, they don't fight fair at all.

We debate whether it is OK to make captives "feel" like they are drowning, they debate what to do with the heads after they decapitate the bodies.

We won't use our most powerful weapons for fear of appearing mean, they will use any means they can steal.

We fund/house the United Nations where our "friends" vote against us and then pander to those who hate us while being afraid to tell the truth about our enemies, they use it as a weapon to lie about us, call us names and undermine everything we do.

Our "moderates" want no torture of the enemy and an open border for them to have access to us, their "moderates" only voice their wish that Israel be destroyed.

We are so strong and prosperous most of us don't even realize or care that we are in a war, they have nothing better to do than to plot our destruction.

We depose a dictator and create a democracy in three years with historically low casualties and it is considered a massive defeat, they blow themselves up while the rest hide in caves and it is portrayed as a great victory.


John Ziegler

ACLU Promotes Voter Fraud

Crossposted from Stop The ACLU
Via The ACLU Website:

The American Civil Liberties Union today expressed its disappointment with the House passage of a bill placing undue and unnecessary burdens on Americans' fundamental right to vote. H.R. 4844, the "Federal Election Integrity Act of 2006," requires voters to present a government-issued photo ID in order to vote in federal elections. In addition, beginning in 2010 voters would be required to present a photo ID that was issued based on proof of citizenship in order to vote. The measure passed by a vote of 228-196.

From Caroline Fredrickson, Director of the ACLU Washington Legislative Office:

"Less than two months after the renewal of the Voting Rights Act, the House of Representatives has chosen to pass legislation disenfranchising the very citizens the VRA was designed to protect. No eligible citizen should have to pay to vote. There are voters who simply don't have photo ID and requiring them to purchase one in order to vote would be tantamount to a poll tax. This measure will disproportionately impact racial and ethnic minority voters, senior citizens, voters with disabilities, and others who do not have photo identification nor the financial means to acquire it."

What a load! This ridiculous "poll tax" memo is quickly making its rounds. Nancy Pelosi has taken the ball with this one and ran it with the alarmist title, "Voter ID Bill Is an Attempt to Suppress the Votes of Millions of American Citizens!"

Perhaps they are worried this act will supress "millions" of illegals and dead people from voting! An I.D. is required in many of the most basic things in America such as driving a car or even cashing a check. Please, tell me how all these poor people who can't afford an I.D. - cash their welfare checks?

Rep. Henry Hyde makes the same point.

But Rep. Henry Hyde (R-Ill.), who sponsored the Federal Election Integrity Act, says requiring voters to show photo ID at the polls "presents no greater hardship than people face performing everyday activities."

For example, Hyde noted that government-issued photo IDs are required for driving vehicles, applying for Social Security, Medicare or Medicaid, food stamps, boarding airplanes, entering government buildings, registering at school, getting student loans, renting movies, and cashing checks.

Given all the cases in which U.S. citizens are asked to produce photo IDs, it should not be difficult to produce IDs to guard against fraud in the electoral system, Hyde said.

It really isn't surprising that the ACLU would be against making our democratic process have more integrity. After all, they know which side butters their bread. They even keep a scorecard on Congress.

The ACLU are involved across the country fighting voter I.D. laws. In Missouri at least 16 St. Louis area Democrats have been found guilty of election crimes in the last year and a half! When Republican Gov. Matt Blunt signed a law requiring voters to provide I.D. the ACLU had to come up with a different argument than the poll tax crap. Even though Missouri the Missouri law provided for free photo IDs that voters could obtain before election day the ACLU represented a group of Democrats to challenge the law by arguing for a loophole they found stating the law violated a state constitutional provision against imposing costs on local governments without providing state funding. So much for the poll tax argument or putting an undue burden on the poor.

As a matter of fact as Digger's Realm points out:

Those against it are claiming it's a poll tax on the poor, minorities and elderly and that they can't afford to get a drivers license or passport. They fail to mention that the bill includes a portion to pay for free for the poor who can't afford a photo ID.

People can see for themselves. The full text of the bill is here.

The ACLU were also involved in the recent case against a similar bill in Georgia that was struck down. It also provided free I.D.s. They also fought voter ID laws in New Mexico, Michigan, and Indiana. The ACLU has clearly shown its true colors in support of voter fraud. The only possible reason I can realistically see why someone would be against this bill is if they actually desire for voter fraud to continue. Once again the ACLU has shown just how transparent their lie of non-partisanship is. It is clear what the ACLU and democrats want. They want rights for illegal aliens, dead people, and felons to vote early and often.

Christianity: A Disposable Religion?

Remember those two Fox reporters who were kidnapped in Iraq and who converted to Islam to save their lives? I remember thinking, "What’s the point? We all know the conversion is bogus. Why did their captors even bother?". On further reflection - I know why they bothered. That video of the hostages sitting in robes, extolling their newfound religion was not intended for us, it was intended for the Muslim world. Why? Because what the Muslim world saw were two Christian Westerners who’s belief system was so weak - they’d throw it away without a second thought - if their lives were threatened. Living proof of what the likes of Usama Bin-Laden have been saying for years: that the West’s resolve is so weak –they’ll roll over and surrender at the first sign of real danger. And that this -and this alone- will allow Islam’s victory over a technologically superior enemy.

Don’t get me wrong I’m not condemning Steve Centanni and Olaf Wiig – I would have done exactly the same thing. But that’s exactly the point. You think any of the prisoners at Gitmo would ever contemplate conversion to Judaism or Christianity to alleviate their plight? .. [See the problem?]

Today is a critical day in the war of civilizations. Iraq’s Mujahedeen Army has posted a message on the internet threatening Pope Benedict XVI with a suicide attack. The Pope is scheduled to give a public statement later today. If he caves in any way to the death threats and criticism from radical Islam and its Western enablers, he will, by emboldening our enemy, bring us one step closer to defeat - in a much bigger sense than the kidnappers of Centanni and Wiig could have ever dreamt of.

I pray God will give this Pope the courage to stand firm and not hand the Islamists another - and major - confirmation of their belief in the West's cowardice, and not further facilitate their war against us. This has to stop somewhere!

.

Christians Worship a Monkey on a Cross?

This is a new “cartoon” circulating on Muslim sites around the world.



Translation of Arabic writing:

"Swine and servant of the cross. Worships a monkey on a cross. Hateful evil man. May Allah curse him, blood-sucking vampire. Behead the Pope."

Note to those who wished to believe that because they were not Jews they had little to fear from the “religion of peace”: Wake the fuck up!

.

Dems Preparing for Defeat

The Washington Post is already laying the groundwork for the now standard “We got robbed” strategy.

Story here.

.

Homeland Security

Hypocrite Imbeciles on Rampage. Again

Listen to this:

"Pakistan’s Foreign Ministry also called the pope’s remarks “regrettable.”
“Anyone who describes Islam as a religion as intolerant encourages violence,” Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Tasnim Aslam said.".

I’m not kidding. Read this.

Here's some more turdolini with basil:

Salih Kapusuz, deputy leader of Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan's Islamic-rooted party, said Benedict's remarks were either "the result of pitiful ignorance" about Islam and its prophet or, worse, a deliberate distortion.

"He [Pope Benedict] has a dark mentality that comes from the darkness of the Middle Ages. He is a poor thing that has not benefited from the spirit of reform in the Christian world," Kapusuz told Turkish state media. "It looks like an effort to revive the mentality of the Crusades."

"Benedict, the author of such unfortunate and insolent remarks, is going down in history for his words," Kapusuz added. "He is going down in history in the same category as leaders such as Hitler and Mussolini."

Full story here.
.